Monday, 16 November 2020

Negative Emotions: How to deal with Team Coaching?



Emotions are biological states associated with the nervous system brought on by neurophysiological changes variously associated with thoughts, feelings, behavioral responses, and a degree of pleasure or displeasure.

Feelings–Emotions are identified as preceding feelings, which lean to be our reactions to the varied emotions we encounter.

Feelings occur in the neocortical regions of the brain and are the next step in how we acknowledge our emotions as an individual.

One of the more popular psychological theories of emotions is Robert Plutchik’s Wheel of Emotions.

Plutchik (1980) stated that there are eight basic emotions: joy, trust, fear, surprise, sadness, anticipation, anger, and disgust.

Anger, frustration, fear, and other “negative emotions” are all part of the human experience. They can all lead to stress and are usually observed as emotions to be avoided, ignored, or disavowed. Nobody wants to accept uncomfortably, so it is legitimate to prefer to evade these feelings, and the menaces of unmanaged stress are real.

Some of the questions which we desire to look for at the team environment to protect team member’s emotions are in balance.
The emotions aren’t always immediately subject to reason, but they are always immediately subject to action. WILLIAM JAMES

The questions to look for

1. How do we take care of the habitat so that negative emotions don’t get out of hand?

2. How does each team members handle his or her own negative emotions?

3. How do I and my team members respond to negative emotions when it arises?

Case No 1: If we find team members perform a costly mistake at work and leaders or Managers blame the workers and question his or her ability to do the job properly in public, this is the moment where you can coach those managers to reform the leadership style. Such Incidents trigger negative emotions at the team level.

Case No 2: If we find a team member who is about to make a presentation but thinks that it will go poorly and leaders/managers comment to the team members to make a good presentation no matter what, as the whole department depends on it, this is the moment where you can coach those managers to reform the leadership style. Such Incidents trigger negative emotions at the team level.

Case No 3: If we find Team members of a scrum team are likely inadequate to satisfy an approaching deadline for a critical project and managers/leaders express his/her frustration openly to them: “My reputation is on the line. I’ll be pissed if we don’t meet the deadline”, this is the occasion where you can coach those managers to reform the leadership style. Such Incidents trigger negative emotions at the team level.

Case no 4: If we find the Scrum team has delayed in finishing a scrum demo work because of a team member’s negligence. Highlight to the team that it was the one team member’s fault and managers/Leaders show frustration by shaking your head, sighing, and criticizing the worker behind his back, this is the moment where you can coach those managers to reform the style. Such Incidents trigger negative emotions at the team level.

Case no 5: If we find, team leaders and team members are disagreeing over work-related issues. The team members seem to be getting frustrated and annoyed and the leader is Keep emphasizing his/her point and take on an unfavorable expression, also Saying something is not respectful: “Whether you like it or not, this is how I want it. Maybe you still don’t realize it. Do I have to clarify it again?”, this is the occasion where you can coach those managers to reform the style. Such Incidents trigger negative emotions at the team level.

Let us watch for warning signs across the scrum teams we are coaching.

Do we find team members putting in fewer hours or less effort? Has engagement dwindled? team members are not showing up for important Scrum Events? Look for the team members’ resentments. Take a close glance at hard data and trends that can be signs of dissatisfaction and disengagement, such as late arrivals, absenteeism, and other such negative behavior.

When a complication originates, don’t put criticism on employees.

Try to attack the problem, rather than the Individuals.

Make sure team members have an acceptable workload, sufficient supports, and are recognized when it’s warranted.

Even Team members who are passionate and love their jobs can experience burnout.

Ensure everyone at your organization is equipped to provide and receive effective feedback and let employees have a voice in individual and team goals.

There’s nothing more discouraging than trying and failing to reach an impractical goal.

Demonstrate care and concern for your team members and their personal lives, especially in times of crisis, and help them reach organizational goals as a team.

Anxiety often arises from the fear of the unknown. Keep Team members in the loop with constant, appropriate, and transparent communication. Let Team members know it’s okay to ask for help and ensure they know how to access all the resources available to them.

As a coach, we have to manage emotions and it is critical in determining whether the outcome for the team will be positive or negative.

Research has found that people tend to regulate their emotions in one of two ways: suppression or reappraisal.

If Team members spend too much time dwelling on negative emotions and the situations that might have caused them, they could go into a spiral of rumination. Rumination is the tendency to keep thinking, replaying, or obsessing over negative emotional situations and experiences (Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991).

In this spiral of negative thinking, team members can end up feeling worse and worse about the situation, the result of which could be a number of detrimental effects to team member's mental and physical wellbeing.

There is a tension between Positive and Negative emotions which we need to balance in a team's ambient.

Let us push towards Postive side of the emtions to build better team.

Sunday, 8 November 2020

Farmer Family Performance appraisal in a Village!



Once upon a time there was a farmer, his name was Panduraja!

He has 5 children, Jhooti, Bheema, Arjoona, Nakooola, Shooyaya!

Some of them are educated, some are only matriculation pass!

They had multiple acres of farming land. They have a large house with ponds and many domestic animals to looks after. Initially, they had a struggling life but over a period of time, they stabilized themselves.

But the Farmer Panduraja was in worry! Every year they discussed how they should share their profit. They have their own family but they reside together on the same premises. Most of the initial year they had a quarrel and tussle with the money distribution.

They had an expert professional friend who also happens to be their distant relatives and well-wisher. His name was Kris, who is a Ph.D. in Agriculture and professor HOD in a nearby college.

Every year this is a nightmare challenge for Panduraja,

How can he distribute the profit among his children so that they stay motivated and energized.

They should not break up their property and leave the premises where they reside together.

Panduraja often chats with Kris. Kris recommended using the Bell curve system to distribute wealth and profit.

Kris read that somewhere, and they tried for a few years. But it did not work out as it created a quarrel and division among his children.

All his children are working for a common goal. Their proficiency is different, and core competencies are diversified.

Nakooola was remarkably talented at selling the crops, milk, eggs, and poultry meat.

Jhooti was excellent at cultivating lands and growing crops.

Bheema takes care of distributing the cattle, goats to the city, and buying and selling those.

Shooyaya was taking care of the farming, fishing, and exporting fishery commodities.

Jhooti also was taking care of the account part with his father and track the balance sheet.

Everyone is contributing to some of the other aspects and occasionally when crops fail but other services take care of their profits.

All the five brothers do daily standup and monthly progress with the Panduraja.

They reskill themselves as the market changes, need changes. Ther wife also takes care of the textile and other handlooms, handmade items e.g. pottery, etc.

The million-dollar question is how do Panduraja distribute the prosperity which will cause everyone happy?

Kris comes out with One team approach where there will not be any bell but team outcome with impact-driven measurement. They have to increase the outcome and strengthen the bottom line. Based on the numerous feedback mechanisms from various stakeholders, the final amount will differ. Their fundamental wealth distribution calculation is more or less fixed, the % variation of wealth distribution is not substantial. There will be a special monitory award for exceptional performance.

e.g. once there was a bumper production of Mango and Nakoola could export mangoes abroad with his contact at a special price. That attempt has fetched significant profit, and he got special monetary gain. Due to crop failure one year, everyone takes the loss amount, but due to the fish & poultry market, they could all get the benefit of this.

They watch out on a periodic basis and manifest on what they should promptly do to minimize the damage and maximize the profit.

So with the Kris guide, Panduraj could able to balance the equal distribution of wealth looking at the performance award one was doing better to expand the business outcome. Special recognition of monitory distribution happens when such spike benefits happen when the performance was done by going beyond the defined boundary.

This ownership model was working fine with the farmer family.

Now, Panduraja extended such a model with other families of the village. It motivates all the family members to put in their finest effort as they are merely gaining the profit. If they suffer a loss, it is absorbed by the other gains avenues. Now it has been one decade they are following this model.....

This Self-driven, Self-organized, shared purpose, outcome & impact, Value generation, one team-driven mindset enabling them to maximize the profit margin. Shareholders are also happy as they get their due service.

Do you think there is no conflict, no dispute, it is always there, but they are resolving all these to stay relevant in the market.

After Panduraja died, they keep Kris & their mother as their final authority to take the final call for any decision making. It was a democratic approach, but decision-making was taken by the Kris and their mother based on the data.

Why Guidebooks?